Re: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?

From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:09:29 -0700
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)

One area that I think might be problematic is the need for two mentors from the Architecture Council. However, I think we can solve that problem.

We could just get two AC members who want to be members for SOC and then have them be the mentors for all the SOC sub-projects...

- Bjorn

--

[end of message]

References:
- [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
  - From: Wayne Beaton

Prev by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] Nexus project
Next by Date: RE: [technology-pmc] Nexus project
Previous by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
Next by thread: [technology-pmc] [Fwd: IP CQs waiting on your team]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top