[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [stp-pmc] PROPOSAL: SOA Tools Platform Incubator Sub-Project
|
I agree with you both, these are things yet to be settled. I've been
dragging my feet on this one as I kept up with the Europa devoirs,
so I haven't updated the proposal yet with Carl's input.
The elements within the alleged incubator need their own schedules, so
basically these guys are the sub-projects and ergo need their own
fully-fledged proposals. The 'incubator' is not a project in and
of itself, and is rather a state applied to the sub-projects.
Does this make sense? If so I will draft some new proposals on
the list here.
best regards
Oisin
yes, these are some of the issues I called out to Oisin initial
proposal. It still needs a lot of work before I believe it can be
let out or actioned.
thanks for the mail,
Carl.
Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
Oisin, Carl,
While I applaud the idea of an STP Incubator, please note that
components are not "sub-sub-projects" under the Eclipse
Development Process. Components are "wholy owned subsidiaries" and
thus ship on the same schedule as their owning project, etc. If
you need independent sub-projects, then they have to be real sub-
projects, not just components.
- Bjorn
Oisin Hurley wrote:
On 30 May 2007, at 15:18, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Will the incubator have one or more projects. What are those
projects currently- i.e. do they map to the components?
In Eclipse terms, the incubator will be a sub-project of STP. The
components
in the incubator will effectively be sub-projects too I think -
they will
have their own committers and leads, and set their schedules.
----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
