Re: [stp-pmc] BPEL and STP con call

[Oisin Hurley <ohurley@xxxxxxxx>]

> > Alex Boisvert echoed this concern with respect to the BPMN
> > project, stating that the projects are useful enough in their own
> > right,
> > and that requiring users to download all of STP just to use a BPMN
> > editor was not a good idea.
>
> I do not understand that comment at all. Just because technologies  
> move into
> the STP TLP does not imply a particular packaging strategy. If  
> there is a
> community requirement for independent downloads for BPMN and/or  
> BPEL editors
> that can be done by the projects whether or not they are included  
> in STP.

I agree - it may be that there was some misunderstanding. As of this  
moment,
the projects are separately downloadable, and there's no plans to  
change this.

 regards
  Oisin