RE: [stp-pmc] BPEL and STP con call

["Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Alex Boisvert echoed this concern with respect to the BPMN
> project, stating that the projects are useful enough in their own
> right,
> and that requiring users to download all of STP just to use a BPMN
> editor was not a good idea.

I do not understand that comment at all. Just because technologies move into
the STP TLP does not imply a particular packaging strategy. If there is a
community requirement for independent downloads for BPMN and/or BPEL editors
that can be done by the projects whether or not they are included in STP.