Re: [stp-pmc] Fwd: [stp-dev] writing an introspector...

[Daniel Berg <danberg@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Keep in mind that the Tuscany Java support
deals with binary files whereas the STP support needs to deal with source
code.  These are two completely different environments and I would
be surprised if you could reuse anything from Tuscany other than the definition
of the annotation tags.

Regards,
Dan

Oisin Hurley <ohurley@xxxxxxxx>
Sent by: stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

08/21/2006 10:41 AM

Please respond to
STP PMC list <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	STP PMC list <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [stp-pmc] Fwd: [stp-dev] writing an introspector...

> No estimate at this time.  I am not sure
if our group can contain  
> the work effort to contribute Java implementation support.

Thanks for getting Devang on the case, Dan.

Since the Java implementation is going to be very important, there
may be something that we can take from Tuscany - alternatively we
can start a new effort within the STP itself. I'll talk to the
Tuscany guys to see how we could work this out.

  cheers
   --oh

_______________________________________________
stp-pmc mailing list
stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc