[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [stp-pmc] Fwd: [stp-dev] writing an introspector...
|
Keep in mind that the Tuscany Java support deals with binary files
whereas the STP support needs to deal with source code. These are
two completely different environments and I would be surprised if
you could reuse anything from Tuscany other than the definition of
the annotation tags.
I would think we'd certainly use the annotations jar - but wouldn't the
binary data be available to STP too, provided the source project has a
Java builder? If this available then we could take some of that code
and repurpose it, or if we can't use it in it's entirety we could use
it as a starting point? The model-population part will need to change
of course to fit in with our current core code.
On a slight different note, I think we should look seriously at getting
our Core up to date wrt to the 0.95 changes - or at least have a roadmap
for it. With the extra publicity surrounding www.osoa.org and the
increase
in people interested in SCA tools, it's a question we will be asked
quite
often I would guess. One for the FAQ. What do you think Dan?
cheers
--oh