Hi all,
Von: Leo Sauermann [mailto:leo.sauermann@xxxxxxx]
SMILA-folks: please package the 3rd party dependencies so that they are
still normal JARS!
(do not use this option: Bundle-ClassPath: myembeddedlib.jar
extract the whole JAR, manipulate the manifest to be both a normal jar
and OSGi jar, then repackage)
OK, we can do this. What about the bundle/jar names ?
In osgi it's good practice to use the reverse domain name as bundle
symbolic name (e.g. org.jempbox.xmp) and also for the bundle file name
concatenated with the version by an _ (e.g. org.jempbox.xmp_0.2.0.jar).
Is this ok for aperture (adopting names of jars in build scripts etc.)?
The SMILA people can help us package the external libs as OSGi jars.
SMILA - can you organize a release of PDFBox?
I will contact the guys from PDFBox to see if they are willing to do a
release.
But then there are still dependencies to jai jars, which are not EPL
compatible.
Bye,
Daniel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Aperture-devel mailing list
Aperture-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aperture-devel