[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [smila-dev] [Fwd: Re: outdated libraries problem]
|
i give my opinion, bottom up:
3. risky business. how can u ensure that -- even a revision upgrade wont break anything? I agree, I'd should but then: we all should produce fault free software. do we?
2. I rather do the CQ nows with older libs that have proven to work, than to prolong the process due to updates of libs on the 3rd party end.
yes, a CQ for a newer version is some work but I don’t think it will be too bad -- at least that is the impression that I have so far b/c the ground work was done once.
1. we can do that and they probably greatly welcome that. but I would see this as last resort, iff we really cant find the sources anymore. in no case I would now want to check which 3rd party libs are outdated and replace them the current ones in their source project. that is work that the respective OOS communities need to do themselves, it's just nor feasible for us, both, monetary/resource and timeframe-wise.
Kind regards
Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH
-----Original Message-----
From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ivan Churkin
Sent: Mittwoch, 1. Oktober 2008 14:20
To: Smila project developer mailing list
Subject: Re: [smila-dev] [Fwd: Re: outdated libraries problem]
Hi folks,
There are many outdated libraries used in 3rd party frameworks like
ActiveMQ, ODE, etc.
It looks like they are not up to date only because no one do it.
It cause CQ for old jars and problems with discovering sources.
1. we may update maven pom's and send patches to framework communities...
2. CQ as it is now.
3. Update 3rd party libraries only in our distribution manually.
--
Ivan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Тема:
> Re: outdated libraries problem
> От:
> Ivan Churkin <ivan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Дата:
> Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:05:41 +0700
> Кому:
> dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Кому:
> dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Thank you James,
>
> James Strachan wrote:
>> 2008/10/1 Ivan Churkin <ivan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Hi folks.
>>>
>>> We trying to pass Apache ActiveMQ via Eclipse legal process. But,
>>> unfortunately, it uses old and even beta version of XPP3
>>> (1.1.3.4.D_b4).
>>> http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/xgws/xsoap/xpp/mxp1/
>>
>> Thats an optional dependency for using XPath selectors AFAIK - you
>> don't need it if you wanna use ActiveMQ.
>>
> Using of XPath selectors planned...
>> It could be we could do some pom.xml trimming - want to send us a patch?
>>
> Ok, will discuss it with our team.
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> smila-dev mailing list
> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>
_______________________________________________
smila-dev mailing list
smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
