[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [rt-pmc] test JAR decision tree
|
Yes, that is exactly the point I was trying to make, though I clearly
didn't use the best word.
On 9/7/2010 10:53 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
one open question to me is around the bit in there about the test code
being distributed...
common definition as near as I can tell is that source code in your
repository is considered being 'distributed' so if I need to write a
bit of code to start and stop something like apache ds in a test case
then I would then have to shove it and all of its transitive lovelies
that it uses through a CQ process...
imo that sort of code should not be considered 'distributed' by virtue
of it being in SCM unless its going into sources jar files..
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 08:03, Mike Keith<michael.keith@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was given an action item to come up with something that outlined the
relevant questions and issues about test JARs, so I put something together
in a format that was close to what already existed for regular code
contributions. This is a first stab, and there are some questions that we
need to come to agreement on, but hopefully this is something that extracts
the critical issues and will enable us to more quickly iterate to a
conclusion. If we can discuss this in our meeting tomorrow then I can update
it wth any changes/additions and send out a final agreed-upon version that
we can refer to in CQs and put on the wiki.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
