[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [rt-pmc] new Potomac proposal
|
Looks interesting. The one (potential) issue is the RT scope restriction on "significant tooling efforts". As I understand Potomac, it would not be reasonable/useful to separate the runtime from the tooling at this stage (they are closely linked as they are evolving). So the question really comes down to "is the Potomac tooling effort 'significant' in the context of the RT charter"? As the end goal of Potomac is the runtime environment I tend to think of the tooling as "a necessary element" but not the focus and so is ok at this point. Ideally Potomac would evolve and mature such that separating the tooling would/could make sense but that is likely some time off.
Others have thoughts?
Jeff
On 2010-05-18, at 6:40 PM, Anne Jacko wrote:
> Mike, Wayne (RT PMC),
>
> Please review and comment on this new project proposal from Chris. Thanks.
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/potomac/
>
>
> Anne Jacko
> emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
