I echo Tom's comments. Slides look good but N+1 should not be the
default versioning scheme. People need some level of stability.
Jeff
Thomas Watson wrote:
Slides look good to me.
My only comment is on the future plans for ECF 4.0. Do you have a
major release each year with a major version increase? Do you always
anticipate on making breaking changes for each yearly release? My
concern is for the ECF bundles which are now part of the Equinox
release. Down in the core platform we tend to keep the major version
of our bundles for many releases. I am wondering how much breaking
changes we should anticipate in our dependencies on ECF.
This comment should not hold up your submission of the slides.
Tom
Inactive hide details for Scott Lewis ---05/29/2009 09:54:26
AM---Attached please find the ECF 3.0/Galileo review slides.Scott
Lewis ---05/29/2009 09:54:26 AM---Attached please find the ECF
3.0/Galileo review slides.
From:
Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
05/29/2009 09:54 AM
Subject:
[rt-pmc] ECF review slides
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attached please find the ECF 3.0/Galileo review slides.
[attachment "ECF Project 3.0 Release Review.pdf" deleted by Thomas
Watson/Austin/IBM] _______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc