[rmf-dev] performance testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[rmf-dev] performance testing

From: François Rey <fr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:22:41 +0200
Delivered-to: rmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/rmf-dev>
List-help: <mailto:rmf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rmf-dev>, <mailto:rmf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/rmf-dev>, <mailto:rmf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7

Hello everyone,
I recently started hacking ProR (see forum posting) and submitted a couple change requests on gerrit:
https://git.eclipse.org/r/14638: Better use of EMF reflective API in the ReqIF10Util class.
https://git.eclipse.org/r/14639: Better editing of default values.
The gerrit setup does not seem to automatically build and test upon a new change request.
I've successfully run locally the tests I've found in the eclipse projects, but I'm not sure of any performance impact. Any performance test out there?
I'm asking because the first change request is touching some core behavior in ReqIF10Util, with more use of EMF reflective API to reduce boiler-plate code.
Cheers,
François

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rmf-dev] performance testing
  - From: Michael Jastram
- Re: [rmf-dev] performance testing
  - From: Michael Jastram

Prev by Date: Re: [rmf-dev] Building RMF
Next by Date: Re: [rmf-dev] performance testing
Previous by thread: [rmf-dev] Building RMF
Next by thread: Re: [rmf-dev] performance testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs