Re: [riena-dev] Riena Update

[Christian Campo <christian.campo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Scott,

happy new year you too....

Its ok for me if you write down a Note on the wiki page about ECFs  
goal or why you think ECF goals are in sync. If you like to post that  
note also here or just a link is really your decision. If the Note  
gets longer, you might as well put it on a seperate page and link from  
my Rienas Goals page. (either way is good)

I think its easiest if you just write down what you have in mind. I  
can either review it or just look at in the wiki page. Whatever you  
want.

I am sure that ECF could implement all the goals on the wiki page. I  
just named those that we have already implemented. So maybe in your  
Note you want to distinguish between what is implemented and what  
could be implemented.

does that work for you ?

christian

Am 02.01.2009 um 18:29 schrieb Scott Lewis:

> Hi Christian,
>
> Happy New Year to you and other Rieners.
>
> I intend to write a note describing why I think the Riena goals are in
> line with ECF's goals for remote services,...and suggesting again that
> Riena_RemoteServices be used as the basis of a provider implementation
> of ECF's remote services API (along with any necessary
> improvements/extensions of the ECF remote services API itself in the  
> ECF
> 3.0 release cycle).  Two questions:
>
> 1) Would you or others like to work with me in doing this?
>
> 2) Would you rather have the output sent
>
> a) here (to this maling list)?
> b) on the Riena_RemoteServices goals page?
> c) both?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
>
> Christian Campo wrote:
> > Hi Rienaers,
> >
> > happy new year !!!
> >
> > I have done a number of changes to Remote Services.
> > One is that the RemoteServiceFactory will now always require a
> > BundleContext to register a Remote Service Proxy. That proxy is than
> > bound to the lifecycle of that BundleContext. That is a much cleaner
> > approach than the optional hostId that existed previously.
> > I have also fixed a number of issues with the Attachment object, we
> > know use the Hessian2 protocol all the way through and the servlet  
> > for
> > Hessian was renamed to RienaHessianDispatcherServlet.
> > There is also a new Exception ProxyAlreadyRegisteredFailure which is
> > thrown when a remote service proxy already exists.
> >
> > These changes also pulled a lot of changes in dependant code like
> > testcases, samples etc. which I committed.
> >
> > These changes are documented in
> > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Riena_New_And_Noteworthy#RC1 our new New and
> > Noteworthy Wiki section. And yes we are aiming for a Release
> > Candidate. The plan is to have that candidate ready by the 16th of
> > January.
> >
> > Please add any changes or fixes you do to the New and Noteworthy  
> > section.
> >
> > - christian
> >
> > p.s. I also took the time between the year to write a little wiki  
> > page
> > about the Goals and Motivation for Remote Services in Riena. That was
> > recommended by one of our mentors.
> > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Riena_RemoteServices
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > riena-dev mailing list
> > riena-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/riena-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> riena-dev mailing list
> riena-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/riena-dev