Von: riena-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:riena-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Hoch, Holger
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. November 2008 10:25
An: Riena Developers list
Betreff: [riena-dev] RE: [poll] Consistent naming of extension
interfaces
Hi Stefan,
I prefer I<…>Extension to
make clear this refers to an extension point. I would use I<…>Definition
if I intended to be less restrictive, ie. if I would not like to restrict
the definition to extension points.
cheers,
--Holger
From: riena-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:riena-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liebig, Stefan
Sent: Dienstag, 11. November 2008 09:24
To: Riena Developers list
Subject: [riena-dev] [poll] Consistent naming of extension interfaces
In Riena we have extension interfaces mapping to extensions.
Such an interface has to be
annotated with @ExtensionInterface.
Currently there is no naming convention for those
interfaces. Should we have on? Or is
annotating sufficent?
Currently there a few that are named like
- I<Tralala>Definition
- I<Dadada>Extension
and others not following a convention.
Any preferences?
No virus
found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.0/1779 - Release Date: 10.11.2008
07:53
