Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[riena-dev] RE: [poll] Consistent naming of extension interfaces

Hi Stefan,

 

I prefer I<…>Extension to make clear this refers to an extension point. I would use I<…>Definition if I intended to be less restrictive, ie.  if I would not like to restrict the definition to extension points.

 

cheers,

--Holger

 

From: riena-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:riena-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liebig, Stefan
Sent: Dienstag, 11. November 2008 09:24
To: Riena Developers list
Subject: [riena-dev] [poll] Consistent naming of extension interfaces

 

In Riena we have extension interfaces mapping to extensions. Such an interface has to be

annotated with @ExtensionInterface.

Currently there is no naming convention for those interfaces. Should we have on? Or is

annotating sufficent?

 

Currently there a few that are named like

- I<Tralala>Definition

- I<Dadada>Extension

and others not following a convention.

Any preferences?

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.0/1779 - Release Date: 10.11.2008 07:53


Back to the top