[riena-dev] [poll] Consistent naming of extension interfaces

[riena-dev] [poll] Consistent naming of extension interfaces

From: "Liebig, Stefan" <Stefan.Liebig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:24:29 +0100
Accept-language: de-DE, en-US
Acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Delivered-to: riena-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/riena-dev>
List-help: <mailto:riena-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/riena-dev>, <mailto:riena-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/riena-dev>, <mailto:riena-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AclD1uq5gD2Z5t2qTfqCPlsv+lINpg==
Thread-topic: [poll] Consistent naming of extension interfaces

In Riena we have extension interfaces mapping to extensions. Such an interface has to be

annotated with @ExtensionInterface.

Currently there is no naming convention for those interfaces. Should we have on? Or is

annotating sufficent?

Currently there a few that are named like

- I<Tralala>Definition

- I<Dadada>Extension

and others not following a convention.

Any preferences?

Follow-Ups:
- [riena-dev] RE: [poll] Consistent naming of extension interfaces
  - From: Hoch, Holger