|Re: [rdf4j-dev] Any opinion about either RDF4J vs Jena within hadoop?|
Hi Jeen,ÂThanks for comment. For now I need to prepare a possible scenario. I will compare all 3 player's on 1 slide in my presentation.All the best,Jacek______________________________On 17/5/18 08:21, Jacek Grzebyta wrote:
There's no explicit support in the rdf4j core, but there's Halyard (https://github.com/Merck/HalyHi,
I am trying to compare usefulness 3 rdf triple stores within Hadoop environment.
I found that:1. CumulusRDF is dead for now.
2. virtuoso OS is not a player in that place.3. Jena delivers support for hadoop features. Especially (reduce (map )) one.ÂÂÂÂ But I have some objections to the local jena: fragility to bnodes in the dataset, slow complex queries processing. I do not know if that was solved.
What about rdf4j?
ard), which is an RDF4J-compatible triplestore on top of Hbase.
Rather incredibly they're on release 1.4, and I only just found out about them a couple of weeks ago. I've been meaning to give it a spin. If you're going to test it out, I'd appreciate you sharing your findings here!
rdf4j-dev mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit