Re: [rdf4j-dev] release plan for 2.3

[Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 20/02/18 19:42, Bart Hanssens (BOSA) wrote:

> > Question: do we include the SHACL functionality as an "experimental"/"beta" feature?
> > I'm for it. Possible downside is that we have zero documentation on how to use it.
>
> +1 on mentioning SHACL, it's an interesting feature for a few public sector projects.
> The current lack of documentation isn't a showstopper IMHO
>
> I'm actually interested in testing it, and writing some basic documentation,
> but I probably won't have time to do that before the release date :-/

Alright, unless someone objects I suggest we merge it in, mention it as 
an experimental feature, and leave documentation until there's time for it.

Cheers,

Jeen