| Re: [rdf4j-dev] what did I miss? |
|
On 17/1/18 01:00, James Leigh wrote:
Hi Jeen, That sounds great! I could use your help in preparing for the 2.3.0 release. I'll do my best. Of course - the minute I sent out my mail I get involved in some urgent stuff at work, hence my late reply. But I should be able to spend some time this weekend. I see on the ticket that "they're looking into it". I hope they get it sorted soon, having our release blocked by something like this is frustrating. Need any help prepping developer documentation about the repo setup change?The current blocker is getting our GPG signing resolved[1]. Although, I think the resolution is out of our hands. I know Eclipse Foundation is migrating away from Hudson to Jenkins, which might mean we have some work to do on that front soon. As soon as we can get the build server working again we should release 2.3.0 and finalize the migration to multiple repositories! I'll have a look at the Skolemization one. I'm not too sure what else I can say about SHACL - it needs testing but I'm not sufficiently across SHACL as a language yet (perhaps I should take the time to learn it :)). Wasn't Havard looking into improvements to get it production-ready as well?Open PRs that could go into 2.3.0 include: * Skolemization of blank nodes[2] - a PR exists, but needs to be reviewed * Shacl[3] needs more reviewing There are a handful of open issues that are not yet scheduled that could go into 2.3.0. These include: * Make all sails faster by using hashing instead of trees * Add triple count design criteria to MemoryStore and NativeStore javadoc, suggested text included * Provide official docker image for RDF4J Server and Workbench * NPE in query engine (UnionOperator) for a specific query * QueryPrologLexer fails to parse multi-line comment The docker one sounds intriguing. I'm certainly no expert but I've been using docker a fair bit at work lately, so I'll see if I can do something useful there. Cheers, Jeen Thanks, James [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=529764 [2] https://github.com/eclipse/rdf4j/issues/438 [3] https://github.com/eclipse/rdf4j-storage/pull/34 On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 09:13 +1100, Jeen Broekstra wrote:Hi James, others, I've been thinking about spending a bit more of my spare time getting back into RDF4J development again. I'm rather out of the loop though. Two questions: 1. what's the status of the split into separate repos? I noticed several repos are set up and contain code, but it also seems that the main rdf4j repo still contains the full codebase. I assume it's a gradual transition? Is there timeline or release schedule I should look at? 2. If I want to get a bit more involved again, any particular issues that you'd recommend I take a look at first? Cheers, Jeen _______________________________________________ rdf4j-dev mailing list rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev_______________________________________________ rdf4j-dev mailing list rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev
|