Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[rdf4j-dev] archive site (was: Re: release 2.0 (and 1.0) tomorrow)

Thanks for this Rick, that's very useful. Let's keep it here (I prefer not to move it to Eclipse). I've set up the CNAME, should trickle through in the next hour or so.

I'm guessing we need a top-level index.html though, since currently http://swirrl.github.io/ gives me a 404? I'll also try and put up a PR for the old system and userdocs, so that we have everything in one place.

As an aside: while we currently use our Wordpress site for RDF4J documentation, I'm happy to consider alternative setups if it makes maintenance/community editing easier.

Cheers,

Jeen

On 17/08/16 23:52, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Hi all,

This morning I got frustrated that the old javadocs aren't online.  So I've rebuilt them from maven going back to sesame-2.7.12

You can temporarily find them here:

https://swirrl.github.io/archive-sesame/

If Jeen wants to set a CNAME record pointing at swirrl.github.io we can host it on archive.rdf4j.org or another subdomain.  I've set things up at github assuming this CNAME for now, but it's easily changed if we'd prefer something else.

https://help.github.com/articles/setting-up-a-custom-subdomain/

Also happy to move the repo somewhere else, e.g. eclipse...  In the meantime I'm also happy to accept PRs for a restyled index.html and more archive docs for historical versions.

R.

On 17 August 2016 at 11:53, Nikola Petrov <nikolavp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We host an old version of the documentation because we are still using sesame in GraphDB. You can check the following links:


Note that those are only used so we can be able to link in our own public documentation. So there might be links which are broken in the documents. I hope that this is useful to someone.

NB: Thanks for Jeen for the effort - he gave us something from his machine with which were able to resurrect a version of the old docs.

-- 
Nikola


On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Rick Moynihan <rick.m@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In that case it's probably a good idea to remove the broken archives link.

What documentation do you think people would want for old versions?  The main thing I find useful are the javadocs, so I was thinking I might generate the javadocs for 2.8.9 (but I could do other versions too) and host them on a spare server somewhere, which you could point archives.rdf4j.org at.

Alternatively we could probably host built versions of them in a github pages repo.

Thoughts?

R.

On 16 August 2016 at 23:18, Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 17/08/16 09:51, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Hi Jeen,

Site's looking really good, the only thing I've noticed is that the archive link to the old sesame docs is broken.

 Yes, unfortunately it will stay that way - there was an accident with the old site hosting compounded by not having any backups. So it's gone :(

Suffice to say I'm making sure the new site is properly backed up on a regular basis.

Jeen

_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev



_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev



_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev




_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev


Back to the top