Re: [rdf4j-dev] release 2.0 (and 1.0) tomorrow

[Rick Moynihan <rick.m@xxxxxxxxxx>]

In that case it's probably a good idea to remove the broken archives link.

What documentation do you think people would want for old versions?  The main thing I find useful are the javadocs, so I was thinking I might generate the javadocs for 2.8.9 (but I could do other versions too) and host them on a spare server somewhere, which you could point archives.rdf4j.org at.

Alternatively we could probably host built versions of them in a github pages repo.

Thoughts?

R.

On 16 August 2016 at 23:18, Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 17/08/16 09:51, Rick Moynihan wrote:

Hi Jeen,

Site's looking really good, the only thing I've noticed is that the archive link to the old sesame docs is broken.

Yes, unfortunately it will stay that way - there was an accident with the old site hosting compounded by not having any backups. So it's gone :(

Suffice to say I'm making sure the new site is properly backed up on a regular basis.

Jeen

_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev