[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ptp-dev] Please test the Juno SR2 Parallel Package - reply to this email
|
Beth
I did some testing creating a synchronized
project on Linux, changing some files, building, cleaning the project,
rebuilding and running. Everything looks like it works except for a couple
exceptions I think are specific to PE Developer Edition and not the SR1
candidate.
I did the same on AIX with a remote
project. I got a bunch of exceptions with no information and no traceback
like the following three
Remote Tools DStore Server:
at org.eclipse.dstore.core.model.Handler.run(Handler.java:135)
Remote Tools DStore Server:
at org.eclipse.dstore.core.model.CommandHandler.handle(CommandHandler.java:110
Remote Tools DStore Server:
at org.eclipse.dstore.internal.core.server.ServerCommandHandler.sendCommands(ServerCommandHandler.java:368)
My error log view looked like the attachment
below.
This entry below might be an initial
error (5th from bottom) that the rest following it cascaded from and may
be an indication of some kind of setup error on my part
Remote Tools DStore Server: Exception
in thread "DStore CommandHandlerThread-3" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
(org/eclipse/cdt/core/index/IIndex) bad major version at offset=6
Dave
From:
Beth Tibbitts/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
To:
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
09/21/2012 01:01 PM
Subject:
[ptp-dev] Please
test the Juno SR2 Parallel Package - reply to this
email
Sent by:
ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Please download the RC4 build of the
parallel package from the link in the attached email
and test on your favorite platform, plus hopefully create and run a parallel
app on your favorite target system configuration (resource manager).
And test a few other of your favorite things.
Please reply to this email saying what client platform, remote resource
manager, and other items you tested.
Thank you!
Unless there is major breakage, which is our final SR1 build, but testing
helps us know if we need to fix things esp. before our SC tutorial in November
- a very important milestone for us in ensuring
trouble-free experience by tutorial attendees and others who will learn
about PTP at the SC conference.
Happy testing, and please let me know you're not ignoring me!
...Beth
Beth Tibbitts
Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools
Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington,
KY 40511
----- Forwarded by Beth Tibbitts/Watson/IBM on 09/21/2012 12:56 PM -----
From: epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Markus Knauer
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:45 AM
To: EPP Developer Mailing List
Subject: [epp-dev] Juno SR1 RC4 EPP packages
Hi package maintainers,
it is time to test our latest (and at the same time last) build for Juno
SR1. This build won't be released early as RC4, instead it will be released
as Juno SR1 next Friday after 'quiet week'. Please send your votes as soon
as possible - I'd like to get your feedback until Monday.
The packages can be found here:
http://build.eclipse.org/technology/epp/epp_build/juno/download/20120920-0804/
With the following p2 repositories you can simulate updates from Juno to
Juno SR1
http://build.eclipse.org/technology/epp/epp_build/juno/download/20120920-0804/repository/
http://download.eclipse.org/releases/maintenance/
Sometimes I am doing last-minute changes... During my review of the packages
I found out that some packages are still using an upper limit of 256MB
for the heap size. We defined this limit years ago and most packages are
using a much higher limit now, but not all packages. I thought that a higher
value does no harm (computers tend to have more memory today) and could
improve the user experience a bit. And that was my change: I set the maximum
Java heap size of Java, CPP, and Mobile packages to 512MB and tracked it
in the following bug. I hope you agree to this change.
Packages should define at least 512m as maximum Java heap size
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=389970
Thanks,
Markus
_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
