[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
RE: [platform-update-dev] rsync or update manager?
|
- From: "Philippe Ombredanne" <pombredanne@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:33:20 -0700
- Delivered-to: platform-update-dev@eclipse.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:importance; b=pNlf05+NTAo04a1msfL+JQKJF+k4B20EHnyrRfsm36Ay4Ahpecck66vyMU4KrujXT898L/BUcbBDWf01tp3K5tuZy6UHbBX2ZlPziarUBtMG+PFfr2yEc9BUs5V9zjoFhHfOYrso7jwe1sfiwwVxCX8Z45rME/5bD6kvD/R9a0c=
- Importance: Normal
> There seems to be some disagreement about the best/easiest
> way to create
> an update site mirror. Can anyone tell me what the recommended way of
> doing this is? Should we use rsync or the update manager from the
> command line?
My take:
If you want to avoid the potential issues that the 3.2 standalone update
has and want a full mirror, then rsync is cool.
If not, especially for selective mirro, use standalone update.
--
Cheers
Philippe
philippe ombredanne | 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com
nexB - Open by Design (tm) - http://www.nexb.com
http://easyeclipse.org - irc://irc.freenode.net/easyeclipse