RE: [platform-update-dev] rsync or update manager?

["Daffin, Miles (IT)" <Miles.Daffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Philippe. 

We do intend a full mirror. What do you mean by "potential issues"? 

Miles

-----Original Message-----
From: platform-update-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:platform-update-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philippe
Ombredanne
Sent: 11 July 2006 23:33
To: 'Eclipse Platform Update component developers list.'
Subject: RE: [platform-update-dev] rsync or update manager?

> There seems to be some disagreement about the best/easiest way to 
> create an update site mirror. Can anyone tell me what the recommended 
> way of doing this is? Should we use rsync or the update manager from 
> the command line?
My take:
If you want to avoid the potential issues that the 3.2 standalone update
has and want a full mirror, then rsync is cool.
If not, especially for selective mirro, use standalone update.


--
Cheers
Philippe

philippe ombredanne | 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com nexB -
Open by Design (tm) - http://www.nexb.com http://easyeclipse.org  -
irc://irc.freenode.net/easyeclipse



_______________________________________________
platform-update-dev mailing list
platform-update-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-update-dev
--------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.