[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [platform-swt-dev] SWT testing platform
|
On second thoughts, I agree. It would not harm to have the Webkit 2.x
libraries also available and would allow us to incrementally add test
coverage whenever we integrate support for Webkit 2.x.
-Arun
Aleksandar
Kurtakov
<akurtako@redhat. To
com> "Eclipse Platform SWT component
Sent by: developers list."
platform-swt-dev- <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
bounces@eclipse.o cc
rg
Subject
Re: [platform-swt-dev] SWT testing
06-02-14 01:09 platform
Please respond to
"Eclipse Platform
SWT component
developers list."
<platform-swt-dev
@eclipse.org>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arun K Thondapu" <arunkumar.thondapu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list."
<platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9:20:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [platform-swt-dev] SWT testing platform
>
> +1. Both GTK 3.8 and recent Webkitgtk sound reasonable to me. However,
I'm
> not sure on when we can claim official support for Webkit2 at this point
of
> time, so may be we can just mention Webkit for now and request for
Webkit2
> when we're actually ready for it.
Webkit 2.x releases contain both the 1.x and 2.x so libs parallel
installable and I'm looking for something that would require both being
available on the machine as I don't expect webmasters to update the machine
again just for having libwebkit2gtk if it's not a prerequisite. So we would
better require it from the beginning.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> -Arun
>
>
>
> Aleksandar
> Kurtakov
> <akurtako@redhat.
To
> com> "Eclipse Platform SWT component
> Sent by: developers list."
> platform-swt-dev- <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> bounces@eclipse.o
cc
> rg
>
Subject
> [platform-swt-dev] SWT testing
> 05-02-14 22:50 platform
>
>
> Please respond to
> "Eclipse Platform
> SWT component
> developers list."
> <platform-swt-dev
> @eclipse.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
> I guess everyone will agree that the Linux platform on which tests are
run
> badly outdated gtk2 and the very first webkitgtk version swt ever
> supported.
> So I would like to get people commenting on what would be suitable
> requirements for these 2 libraries so we can ask for such machine being
> available for running tests on.
> My take on the question is:
> * Gtk 3.8 - Depending on the latest_version-1 is what I think is most
> sensible as this would roughly mean testing on 1 year old gtk version.
With
> both Linux distros and Gtk releasing two versions per year I think people
> having access to latest_version-1 would be biggest group from users.
> * webkitgtk - whatever is on the system but should provide both
> libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0 and libwebkit2gtk-3.0.so.25 (this would be good
> default as it runs plugins out of process thus reducing crashes
> significantly, support not finished yet). Libs are paralel installable
and
> it can roughly be said as "recent webkitgtk 2.x".
>
> Comments welcome?
>
> Alexander Kurtakov
> Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-swt-dev mailing list
> platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-swt-dev mailing list
> platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
platform-swt-dev mailing list
platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
