| Re: [platform-swt-dev] AWT on top of SWT |
|
I'm curious. Define "here", in the "really wouldn't work here"
bit. Are you trying to implement enough AWT to get a recent vintage Swing
running or something? Or just other > AWT 1.1,
non-Swing features.
>I've been working on one, and got it partly working. Getting it to work
as a
>plugin has been challenging wrt classloaders. I chatted with some of the >Instantiations folks at JavaOne, and I think we came up with an idea to make >the classloaders work. I'll see if I can try it out this coming weekend. > >BTW: The OTI implementation for VA Micro that keeps coming up really >wouldn't work here. I've looked into it and it's not complete (I believe it >assumes J2ME personal config, which is rather limited), and wasn't really a >peer setup. > >-- Scott > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: platform-swt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:platform-swt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Rodrigo Augusto >> Barbato Ferreira >> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:05 PM >> To: platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [platform-swt-dev] AWT on top of SWT >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to know if there is (or at least if it >> is possible) to write an alternate implementation of >> the AWT on top of SWT. >> >> Since SWT is VM independent it would yield a VM >> indepent AWT which is quite interesting for reuse >> by VM writers. >> >> TIA. >> >> Best Regards, >> Rodrigo. >> >> -- >> Rodrigo Augusto Barbato Ferreira >> {M|B}.S. Computer Science, U{NICAMP|FMG}/BRAZIL >> Visit the Jewel VM Project at http://www.jewelvm.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> platform-swt-dev mailing list >> platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx >> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev |