Re: [orbit-dev] Pushing bcprov and bcpkix 1.51 into Orbit ... and RC1 de

[Roland Grunberg <rgrunber@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> I agree that the Bundle-SymbolicName should be improved, I think. instead
> of bcprov
> we should use org.bouncycastle.bcprov. I think you can ignore what we did
> for 1.47
> since it never made it to the orbit repository
> 
> -Matthias
> 
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:14 PM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
> 
> > That would be my preference. As that makes it easier to find and is
> > consistent with our "bundle naming policies".
> > That, and the 'symbolic id" is the only thing that would have to change.
> > Well, and I guess the feature file, and the maps entries.
> >
> > But I am not "dictating" it. If you or others think its fine the the way
> > it is ... or, if it suffices to just change the Symbolic Id, then I won't
> > object,
> > but if you do leave as is, hope there's good reason for it, and not just
> > "it will be effort to change". :)

That sounds fine to me, and the module already exists. I'll start making
the necessary changes for my contribution so that we are consistent going
forward.

Cheers,
-- 
Roland Grunberg