Re: [orbit-dev] Different streams for Orbit?

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

You mean you have not noticed the "M"
builds? (In addiition to the I and S builds)  And you do not read
this mailing list? And do not follow Orbit bugzilla's? I suspect its even
covered on with wiki somewhere. 

So ... I think rather than answer your
question directly, I will you to look a little harder for the answer. As
an Orbit committer, you really are expected to follow this list and understand
our policies and procedures ... so if those need to be better documented,
perhaps your fresh perspective can help detail where those should be be
better documented to be found more easily. 

Thanks, 






From:      
 Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,

Date:      
 09/02/2013 12:56 PM
Subject:    
   [orbit-dev]
Different streams for Orbit?
Sent by:    
   orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Hi all,

I've been confused recently by how Orbit is released.
As I integrated Hamcrest 1.3 (library and generator) in Orbit some weeks
before Kepler release, it was not integrated in the release site. So I
thought it would be available in next Orbit release (namely http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/R20130827064939/
) but is was not the case and those bundles are missing. However, they
are available in this repository: http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/S20130724151342/
.
So I'm wondering: are there actually 2 streams of development for Orbit?
a SR and a "next release" ? If yes, what is the reason/added-value?
I find it difficult to guess, streams are usually distinguished through
versions (or a qualifier label), but here there is nothing like that for
Orbit.
-- 
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss,
by Red Hat
My
blog - My
Tweets_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev