Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [nebula-dev] 1.2.0 released

> So all bundles should be bumped from 1.0.0.qualifier to 1.0.100.qualifier for the next release.

BTW this is a suggestion I am making, I am not in a position on the
Nebula project to do more than make such a suggestion :-)

~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders Ltd.
www.kichwacoders.com


On 26 April 2017 at 14:31, Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> HI Matthew,
>
> I assume what is happening here is that the plug-ins are now Semantic
> API versioned (https://wiki.eclipse.org/Version_Numbering for those
> not familiar with it). That is certainly the case with the XYGraph
> plug-in which released version 2.1.0 of
> org.eclipse.nebula.visualization.xygraph and the 1.3.0 release of
> Nebula looks like it will have 3.0.0 of that plug-in. Presumably the
> plug-ins at 1.0 have had not API changes.
>
> That said, the Eclipse platform increments the service version of
> bundles on all releases[1]. That would make it possible to
> differentiate bundles properly. So all bundles should be bumped from
> 1.0.0.qualifier to 1.0.100.qualifier for the next release.
>
> [1] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Version_Numbering#When_to_change_the_service_segment
>
>
> Jonah
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders Ltd.
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
> On 26 April 2017 at 14:12,  <Matthew.Webber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thanks for 1.2.0, we’ve in the process of moving to it.
>>
>>
>>
>> One thing I did notice – the version numbers in the plugins that I got from
>> the 1.2.0 p2 site are all of the form
>>
>> 1.0.0.<date>
>>
>> whereas I was expecting
>>
>> 1.2.0.<date>.
>>
>>
>>
>> The same problem is there for what was advertised as the 1.1.0 release –
>> version numbers that don’t match the putative contents.
>>
>> This is obviously a little confusing.  Did a version number bump step get
>> missed?
>>
>>
>>
>> Obviously this can’t be fixed for releases that have already happened, but
>> it would be great if the version numbers for the upcoming 1.3.0 were
>> correct.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>> From: nebula-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nebula-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Wim Jongman
>> Sent: 15 March 2017 10:29
>> To: Nebula Dev <nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [nebula-dev] 1.2.0 released
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Congratulations! We have delivered the new Nebula release.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or
>> privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If
>> you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the
>> addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not
>> use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to
>> the e-mail.
>> Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and
>> not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
>> Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any
>> attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any
>> damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be
>> transmitted in or with the message.
>> Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England
>> and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and
>> Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nebula-dev mailing list
>> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
>> this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev


Back to the top