Re: [mylyn-pmc] Projects should not be incubating

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Flipping the bit was my plan. They've already graduated and contain
mature code, there's no need for any form of review.

It's been done for Commons, Context, Docs, and Tasks.

Have you considered how each of the subprojects will presented to the
world via the project website?

Wayne

On 01/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mik Kersten wrote:
> What do you mean maturing, passing them through a graduation review?  For
> the ones that contain only code that has been through a graduation review,
> can we just flip the incubation bit on them?
> 
> Mik
> 
> --
> Dr. Mik Kersten
> Tasktop CEO, Mylyn Lead, http://twitter.com/mik_kersten
> Assistant: zoe.jong@xxxxxxxxxxx, +1-778-588-6896, Skype: zoe.e.jong
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mylyn-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mylyn-pmc-
>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steffen Pingel
>> Sent: January-11-11 9:03 PM
>> To: Mylyn PMC discussions
>> Subject: Re: [mylyn-pmc] Projects should not be incubating
>>
>> Then the next question is... how do we go about maturing these projects?
>>
>> Steffen
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> It does. The refactored project bits should be regular. It's only new
>>> stuff that should be incubating.
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>> On 01/11/2011 09:36 PM, Steffen Pingel wrote:
>>>> I would like to mature at least the projects that are participating
>>>> in Indigo before the next milestone as these projects contain matured
>>>> code (i.e. Mylyn 3.4+).
>>>>
>>>>  Mylyn Commons
>>>>  Mylyn Context
>>>>  Mylyn Docs
>>>>  Mylyn Tasks
>>>>
>>>> Mylyn Incubator should remain in incubation as you point out.
>>>>
>>>> I am less sure about these projects as we plan on releasing 0.7
>>>> versions for each in March in parallel to Mylyn 3.5:
>>>>
>>>>  Mylyn Builds
>>>>  Mylyn Reviews
>>>>  Mylyn Versions
>>>>
>>>> My thinking was that the project should be incubating until their 1.0
>>>> release (tentatively planned for June 2012 / Indigo+1).
>>>>
>>>> Does that make sense?
>>>>
>>>> Steffen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Hey PMC members.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just noticed that the newly refactored Mylyn subprojects are all
>>>>> marked as being in incubation. I believe that all of them--except
>>>>> for the incubator--should be marked as regular projects.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that make sense, or have I forgotten something important?
>>>>>
>>>>> Wayne
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mylyn-pmc mailing list
>>>>> mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-pmc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mylyn-pmc mailing list
>>> mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-pmc
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steffen Pingel
>> Committer, http://eclipse.org/mylyn
>> Senior Developer, http://tasktop.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> mylyn-pmc mailing list
>> mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> mylyn-pmc mailing list
> mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-pmc