[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [mylar-dev] I have updated Mylar Integrator Reference
|
Lubos and Alena Pochman wrote:
Having all projects exposed like that would be inconvenient for a user.
Unlike Bugzilla (usually), Codebemer is used to host a lot of projects
that are not related to each other like in Javaforge, which has
hundreds if not thousands of independent projects. I will consult the
issue with Intland (developer of Codebeamer), but for me as connector
developer and Eclipse, Mylar and Codebeamer user, this is the best way
to access Codebeamer.
Let's look at this from the different angle. If one would want to
browse bug reports from any of those projects he would have to create
thousands repository entries in Mylar, and what worst - manage user
identity for each repository entry individually (while JavaForge has
global identity for the whole host).
Consider those comments just a notes of the plugin developer who has
limited plugin experience (connector is my third plugin), and no Mylar
code knowledge. I didn't want to expose the notes on Eclipse wiki (I
was afraid it will not get accepted quite well, which you just
confirmed),
That is not true. I meant to give some suggestion about structuring
and I do think your notes are helpful for connector developers.
but I offered the link to the fellow connector developer, and Mik
asked me if I can put them on Eclipse site.
Feel free to edit/modify them or delete them. I will keep the copy of
my notes on Javaforge.
I spent 4 weeks developing the connector without any documentation,
and with very, very limited help from mylar devel group. I did it
because I like Javaforge, Codebeamer, Eclipse and Mylar.
He he. When I started working on the web connector, most of the API
and extension point didn't exist. :-)
But we do appreciate your enthusiasm, the work you are doing and your
contribution to Mylar project.
regards,
Eugene