I guess Daniel's estimate of 15+ wasn't correct then, as the contributors are exactly those 12 people that you mentioned.
Istvan
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This does not account for the 15+ contributors mentioned by Daniel.
Wayne
On 08/02/2012 03:34 PM, István Ráth wrote:
Dear Wayne,
The version number is bothersome, but is nowhere near as
big a deal as the IP exposure of having potentially accepted
contributions outside of the IP Due Diligence process.
The fact that there are "quite a few" consumers makes this
particularly worrisome.
There are no IP contributions from outside due diligence.
All of the contributors that you listed (and whose work is
contained within VIATRA2) are our current/previous long time
colleagues and everyone is covered by an IP Employer consent
form (each of which have been faxed to the Eclipse Foundation
during the past few years).
Regarding the CQ, you are right that it should list all of
the developers as it represents the original version plus the
most recent delta (this has been a mistake on our part).
Istvan
--
Istvan RATH, PhD
Research associate
Budapest University of Technology and Economics