Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] Transition plan for Query and Transaction

Guys,

I thought I was very clear at yesterday's PMC meeting that I personally will decide the lists of committers for these three components based on input and volunteers from the community.   While OCL seems to be a popular technology in which to get directly involved, the EMF QTV components do not appear to be generating the same long list of volunteers.  So I will reboot these three components with interested parties, regardless of their prior level of involvement.  If we end up with a long list of proven contributors, as is the case for OCL, only then I will consider filtering down the selection.  I won't leave these components with just a single committer.  Involvement from a diverse group of committers is key to avoiding the problem that we're faced with today.

Regards,
Ed


Anthony Hunter wrote:

Hi Bernd,

As you have seen from the controversy over MDL OCL and the precedents set, SAP cannot become commiteers nor lead the EMF Query and Transaction projects. SAP has not demonstrated activity in these components in the last year.

Ed Merks and Christian are going to have to go through the IP logs and tell us who has been activity contributing to Query, Transaction and Validation over the last year.

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613


Inactive hide details for Bernd Kolb ---03/18/2009 10:22:36 AM---Hi all, SAP is willing to staff and lead the EMF Query and TraBernd Kolb ---03/18/2009 10:22:36 AM---Hi all, SAP is willing to staff and lead the EMF Query and Transaction.


From:

Bernd Kolb <b.kolb@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx

Date:

03/18/2009 10:22 AM

Subject:

[modeling-pmc] Transition plan for Query and Transaction





Hi all,

SAP is willing to staff and lead the EMF Query and Transaction.  
However there is one little thing missing from our side: Final upper  
management approval. We have an informal commitment. The official one  
is supposed to be available in early April.

>From our side I would, at least initially, take the lead. For query  
we would add 3 more committers. For transactions 2 in addition.

At the moment we are internally rewriting the query. This will also  
use the proposed index.
For transactions the plan is to keep the project alive and in  
maintenance with some additional features.

Best regards,

Bernd


_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc



_______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

Back to the top