Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would you like your Galileo bugs?
Title: Re: [modeling-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would you like your Galileo bugs?
Thanks, Christian.  I agree, that would not be a bad approach.

The hope regarding components is that the “I’m a project now, not a component” feature of the portal will be available in the next (OK, like 6) months, which means having them separate now may mean not having to create a bunch later.  Plus, I suspect Kenn will want to delegate to each component the responsibility of maintaining these train bugs.  I guess it’s best left up to the Project Lead to determine what’s best for their project.

Best,
Rich


On 10/30/08 3:49 PM, "Christian W. Damus" <cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, Rich,

If I were a PMC member, I would vote for project-level bugs (EMF, GMF, M2M, M2T, MDT, etc.) and implement a checklist of the components in each.

As components implement the requirement of a bug, they add their checkmarks.  When all components are accounted for, the bug is resolved.

Nick has implemented this strategy in a number of cross-component releng bugs, and it has always worked well.

Cheers,

Christian


On 30-Oct-08, at 3:17 PM, Richard Gronback wrote:

Hello,
 
 In case you’ve not followed the Planning Council discussion on this year’s train participation requirements, we’re going to track requirements using Bugzilla.  The approach is to create a bug for each requirement, then clone each for each train participant with a dependency on the “master.”
 
 So the question is, what level of granularity do we want in Modeling on these bugs?  Keep in mind, it’s like 20 bugs for each participant you’ll get by signing up.  If we go by our .sc file list last year in Ganymede, it means we’ll need:
 
 EMF
 EMF-CDO
 EMF-Net4j
 EMF-Query
 EMF-Teneo
 EMF-Transaction
 EMF-Validation
 EMFT-Compare
 EMFT-EcoreTools
 EMFT-Mint
 EMFT-Search
 GMF
 M2M-ATL
 M2M-QVTOML
 M2T-JET
 MDT-OCL
 MDT-UML2
 MDT-UML2Tools
 MDT-XSD
 
 I’m not sure if TMF is expecting to be on the train, so Sven/Frederic please let us know.  Also, if any others are planning to join, please pre-announce your intent now (although technically you have until M4).
 
 Thanks,
 Rich
 
 
 ------ Forwarded Message
 From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 Organization: Eclipse Foundation Inc.
 Reply-To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:54:23 -0700
 To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would you like your Galileo bugs?
 
 Galileo Leads,
 I am creating all the cloned Galileo bugs as per our discussion at EclipseWorld. Before I do, I'd like to know where you want me to put the bugs for your project(s). Here is the table I have so far:
 
   
   Project   Classification   Product   Component   
   Buckminster   Tools   Buckminster   internal-build   
   CDT   Tools   CDT   cdt-releng   
   DLTK   Technology   DLTK   Common   
   DSDP DD   DSDP   DD   General   
   DSDP TM   DSDP   Target Management   Core   
   DTP   DataTools       releng   
   ECF   RT   ECF   ecf.core   
   Platform   Eclipse   Platform   Releng   
   Equinox   RT   Equinox   Framework   
   EMF   Modeling   EMF   Releng   
   EMFT   Modeling   EMFT   Releng   
   EPP   Technology   EPP   installer   
   GEF   Tools   GEF   releng   
   GMF   Modeling   GMF   Releng   
   MDT   Modeling   MDT   Releng   
   M2M   Modeling   M2M   Releng   
   M2T   Modeling   M2T   Releng   
   TMF   Modeling   TMF   Releng   
   Mylyn   Tools   Mylyn   Core   
   RAP   Technology   RAP   Workbench   
   STP   STP       build.system   
   Subversive   Technology   Subversive   Core   
   TPTP   TPTP   TPTP Release Engineering   Build   
   WTP   WebTools   Web Tools   General   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
  
 Rich, Ed,
 If you'd like the modeling sub-sub-projects to have their own set of cloned bugs, please let me know which sub-sub-projects and which bugzilla component to file them under - thanks.
 
 - Bjorn
 
 --
 New Page 1 [end of message]
 
 
_______________________________________________
 eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
 eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
 
 IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
 
 ------ End of Forwarded Message
 
  _______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

 
--
Christian W. Damus
Senior Software Developer, Zeligsoft Inc.
Component Lead, Eclipse MDT OCL and EMF-QTV
E-mail: cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


 


_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

Back to the top