Re: [modeling-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would you li

[Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: [modeling-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would you like your Galileo bugs?

Just to clarify one thing different about this year... “the list” is going to be these bugzilla entries.  IOW, the wiki page used for signup and listing of requirements is anachronistic in favor of the bugzilla managed approach.  Expect these sections to disappear from the wiki and be replaced by links to Bugzilla reports.

But, thanks for confirming the components from M2T are on the train, Paul.

Best,
Rich


On 10/30/08 3:52 PM, "Paul Elder" <pelder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

M2T-Xpand

and

M2T-MTL

are on the list for Galileo

Paul


From: Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2008-10-30 03:19 PM
Subject: [modeling-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would you like your Galileo bugs?

---

Hello,

In case you’ve not followed the Planning Council discussion on this year’s train participation requirements, we’re going to track requirements using Bugzilla.  The approach is to create a bug for each requirement, then clone each for each train participant with a dependency on the “master.”

So the question is, what level of granularity do we want in Modeling on these bugs?  Keep in mind, it’s like 20 bugs for each participant you’ll get by signing up.  If we go by our .sc file list last year in Ganymede, it means we’ll need:

EMF
EMF-CDO
EMF-Net4j
EMF-Query
EMF-Teneo
EMF-Transaction
EMF-Validation
EMFT-Compare
EMFT-EcoreTools
EMFT-Mint
EMFT-Search
GMF
M2M-ATL
M2M-QVTOML
M2T-JET
MDT-OCL
MDT-UML2
MDT-UML2Tools
MDT-XSD

I’m not sure if TMF is expecting to be on the train, so Sven/Frederic please let us know.  Also, if any others are planning to join, please pre-announce your intent now (although technically you have until M4).

Thanks,
Rich


------ Forwarded Message
From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
Organization: Eclipse Foundation Inc.
Reply-To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:54:23 -0700
To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would you like your Galileo bugs?

Galileo Leads,
I am creating all the cloned Galileo bugs as per our discussion at EclipseWorld. Before I do, I'd like to know where you want me to put the bugs for your project(s). Here is the table I have so far:

  
  Project   Classification   Product   Component   
  Buckminster   Tools   Buckminster   internal-build   
  CDT   Tools   CDT   cdt-releng   
  DLTK   Technology   DLTK   Common   
  DSDP DD   DSDP   DD   General   
  DSDP TM   DSDP   Target Management   Core  
  DTP   DataTools       releng   
  ECF   RT   ECF   ecf.core   
  Platform   Eclipse   Platform   Releng   
  Equinox   RT   Equinox   Framework   
  EMF   Modeling   EMF   Releng   
  EMFT   Modeling   EMFT   Releng   
  EPP   Technology   EPP   installer   
  GEF   Tools   GEF   releng   
  GMF   Modeling   GMF   Releng   
  MDT   Modeling   MDT   Releng   
  M2M   Modeling   M2M   Releng   
  M2T   Modeling   M2T   Releng   
  TMF   Modeling   TMF   Releng   
  Mylyn   Tools   Mylyn   Core   
  RAP   Technology   RAP   Workbench   
  STP   STP       build.system   
  Subversive   Technology   Subversive   Core  
  TPTP   TPTP   TPTP Release Engineering   Build  
  WTP   WebTools   Web Tools   General   
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  
 
Rich, Ed,
If you'd like the modeling sub-sub-projects to have their own set of cloned bugs, please let me know which sub-sub-projects and which bugzilla component to file them under - thanks.

- Bjorn