Hi, Rich,
If I were a PMC member, I would vote for project-level bugs (EMF, GMF, M2M, M2T, MDT, etc.) and implement a checklist of the components in each.
As components implement the requirement of a bug, they add their checkmarks. When all components are accounted for, the bug is resolved.
Nick has implemented this strategy in a number of cross-component releng bugs, and it has always worked well.
Cheers,
Christian
On 30-Oct-08, at 3:17 PM, Richard Gronback wrote: Hello, In case you’ve not followed the Planning Council discussion on this year’s train participation requirements, we’re going to track requirements using Bugzilla. The approach is to create a bug for each requirement, then clone each for each train participant with a dependency on the “master.” So the question is, what level of granularity do we want in Modeling on these bugs? Keep in mind, it’s like 20 bugs for each participant you’ll get by signing up. If we go by our .sc file list last year in Ganymede, it means we’ll need: EMF EMF-CDO EMF-Net4j EMF-Query EMF-Teneo EMF-Transaction EMF-Validation EMFT-Compare EMFT-EcoreTools EMFT-Mint EMFT-Search GMF M2M-ATL M2M-QVTOML M2T-JET MDT-OCL MDT-UML2 MDT-UML2Tools MDT-XSD I’m not sure if TMF is expecting to be on the train, so Sven/Frederic please let us know. Also, if any others are planning to join, please pre-announce your intent now (although technically you have until M4). Thanks, Rich ------ Forwarded Message From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Organization: Eclipse Foundation Inc. Reply-To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:54:23 -0700 To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would you like your Galileo bugs? Galileo Leads, I am creating all the cloned Galileo bugs as per our discussion at EclipseWorld. Before I do, I'd like to know where you want me to put the bugs for your project(s). Here is the table I have so far: Project Classification Product Component Buckminster Tools Buckminster internal-build CDT Tools CDT cdt-releng DLTK Technology DLTK Common DSDP DD DSDP DD General DSDP TM DSDP Target Management Core DTP DataTools releng ECF RT ECF ecf.core Platform Eclipse Platform Releng Equinox RT Equinox Framework EMF Modeling EMF Releng EMFT Modeling EMFT Releng EPP Technology EPP installer GEF Tools GEF releng GMF Modeling GMF Releng MDT Modeling MDT Releng M2M Modeling M2M Releng M2T Modeling M2T Releng TMF Modeling TMF Releng Mylyn Tools Mylyn Core RAP Technology RAP Workbench STP STP build.system Subversive Technology Subversive Core TPTP TPTP TPTP Release Engineering Build WTP WebTools Web Tools General Rich, Ed, If you'd like the modeling sub-sub-projects to have their own set of cloned bugs, please let me know which sub-sub-projects and which bugzilla component to file them under - thanks. - Bjorn -- New Page 1 [end of message] _______________________________________________ eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal. ------ End of Forwarded Message _______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
-- Christian W. Damus Senior Software Developer, Zeligsoft Inc. Component Lead, Eclipse MDT OCL and EMF-QTV
|