Hi Adolfo
Thanks for the offer.
I've had a chance to play with QVTo at work in the last couple of days
and Acceleo before that. I've been impressed by both. I also played
with Xpand but disliked its Java-like partial OCL. I've particularly
liked how much of QVTo is declarative, making the legacy rescue QVTi to
QVTm transformation much easier than I expected.
For a tutorial, it's helpful to have four or five 'presenters' to pass
round USB sticks, and generally help dummies.
How the exact contents splits up may also depend on who's giving what
other tutorials at other times.
Ed
On 15/06/2010 11:33, Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:
Ed,
I think that OCL usage in QVTo should be better done by any of the QVTo
team. However, if you don't find any help in this way, I could do it by
my self since as you know I have experience in this area.
On the other hand, my intentions about my next steps on OCL development
is trying to make all the delegate stuff generic so that we can find a
clear way to integrate OCL with UML. However, I don't think I were able
to obtain any functional solution before the ESE deadline (August).
Cheers,
Adolfo.
|
