Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[mdt-ocl.dev] Re: Tagging Bugzilla Entries

Hi Kenn

Inline

Kenn Hussey wrote:
Ed,

I don't see a problem with using the whiteboard field, as long as this doesn't conflict with the way it is being consumed by the plan.
This is my concern. Since I cannot find any documentation on what 'consumed by the plan' means, I cannot tell what might conflict with it.

Does the plan only use a set of known Whiteboard words if a helios/galileo flag is set, or is the entire entry used when a flag is set or ...?
Most other teams just prefix the bug subject with the topic/category, e.g. [library] ...,
That is my ultimate fallback.
or use keywords.
This only works if the required keywords are defined by the Bugzilla admin.
I suppose another alternative would be to use the URL field in some clever way; for example, I've suggested the Papyrus team use this as a way of matching bugs with corresponding documentation on the wiki, although I don't know how robust the search support is for this field...
wiki correlation seems like a good usage for this. RE-using for bug tagging could conflict.

Cheers,

Kenn

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi

We agreed to tag each Bugzilla with a project area name so that we could easily find related bugs.

I tagged Bug 152207 with the tag "ibrary", as a result of which, I get offered a named search for "library".
Just what I wanted.

However I think this is a preference feature for me not for the team. If you select https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=152207
do you see "library" in the penultimate line on the page above "Add" "the named tag" ...?

Assuming you can't, http://wiki.eclipse.org/Bug_Reporting_FAQ#What_is_the_Whiteboard suggests that
to use "library" as a keyword requires assistance from Bugzilla Admin. The general Bugzilla pages
suggest that the Status Whiteboard is for "us", but since it has a special contribution to the project
plan generation I'm worried that if we use it we mess up an undocumented Eclipse facility.

Kenn: can we use the Status Whiteboard for our team annotations?

Else we must change titles to [library] .... which doesn't work well for multi-area bugs.

  Regards

     Ed Willink








Back to the top