Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT vs DDS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT vs DDS

From: "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 12:20:28 -0400
Delivered-to: m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/m2m-iwg>
List-help: <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg>, <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/m2m-iwg>, <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation
Thread-index: AQHgIlOyrjL+M1/ey32qqH1E90z0IQKvOlg5mMosiuA=

Rick,

“In the public domain” means something very specific from a legal point of view. By any chance do you actually mean “make it available in open source”?

If it is the latter, I would assume that this could make a worthy addition to the Eclipse M2M project family.

To that end, we at ThingWorx would gladly contribute our metadata and discovery model into the public domain if there is interest. It is protocol and format agnostic, though there are concrete formats for XML, JSON, and binary streams. We have implemented it on top of HTTP, XMPP, and Websockets

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT vs DDS
  - From: Rick Bullotta

References:
- [m2m-iwg] MQTT vs DDS
  - From: Ian Skerrett
- Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT vs DDS
  - From: Rick Bullotta

Prev by Date: Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT vs DDS
Next by Date: Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT vs DDS
Previous by thread: Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT vs DDS
Next by thread: Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT vs DDS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs