Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [m2e-dev] IP issues + m2e as a "Type A" (license-check only for dependencies) ?

I vote +1 to moving to a Type A model.
@Jason, since you're project lead, can you make it move forward?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:18 PM Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,

I've got in touch with Sharon who confirmed that moving to "Type A" IP model would speed up migration to newer Maven versions. As almost all requirements are ASL, then each each CQ would be automatically approved, only requiring PMC approval. The delay between the request and the approval can be less than an hour, the PMC approval being often the "bottleneck" in the process.
It also seems like Type A is more likely to bring extra feature like batch submission of CQs for multiple jars.

So I think it's a good time for M2E to move to Type A.
Would there be any objection?
I think if we are all fine with it, then the next step would be for project lead to request this change to EMO and PMC.

Cheers,
_______________________________________________
m2e-dev mailing list
m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev


--
"Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd
And if that fails, thenĀ http://goo.gl/tnBgH5

Back to the top