Re: [linuxtools-dev] How to use the org.eclipse.linuxtools.perf plugin

[Rodrigo Fraxino Araujo <rfaraujo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Dmitry,

I believe that maybe we have worked on the same feature (remote perf)?
If that is the case, i would like to say to you that our team have a
great interest on the remote capabilities and that we can even try to
work together on these issues in the future.
Currently Wainer (another comitter) and I are working on a remote
framework for testing using mock capabilities.
We also plan to expand other plugins functionalities.

Could you look for me on #eclipse-linux from freenode with the "gzus"
nickname?

Kind regards,
Rodrigo.

On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 21:18:48 +0400
Dmitry Kozlov <dmitry_kozlov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello Alexander,
> I believe my statement is based on Vladimir's discussion on IRC with 
> you. I have asked him to participate to avoid noisy line.
> 
> Thank you,
> Dmitry
> 
> On 11/27/2013 05:46 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Dmitry Kozlov" <dmitry_kozlov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> >> <linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "hamdene ben-ayed"
> >> <hamdene.ben-ayed@xxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013
> >> 3:15:26 PM Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] How to use the
> >> org.eclipse.linuxtools.perf	plugin
> >>
> >> Hello Hamdene,
> >> we also used perf running on remote target for our CDT-based
> >> development environment called Sourcery CodeBench. We had to
> >> extend linuxtools' perf plugins in order to support remote perf
> >> launch on target because this use case is not supported by
> >> upstream linuxtools. Unfortunately upstream was not interested in
> >> this use case.
> > Dmitry,
> > Would you please clarify this? Do you mean that a patch was not
> > reviewed or rejected without reasoning or that none of the current
> > committers was interested in working on this at the time?
> >
> > If nothing else Linux Tools tries to be really open so please refer
> > to the bugzilla or gerrit patch in case your contribution was
> > rejected for the publicity record. We don't have endless manpower
> > but we always try to onboard people interested in working on Linux
> > Tools according to EDP and I see this as one of the biggest virtues
> > of the projects so if we failed on doing that I would like to check
> > it myself and learn where a mistake was made. P.S. I made have
> > replied or not but my memory is vague about it.
> >
> > Alexander Kurtakov
> > Red Hat Eclipse team
> >
> >> If you plan to contribute your work back to upstream we might be
> >> interested in cooperation. If you are interested in, could you
> >> provide more details about what are you interested in contributing
> >> upstream?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Dmitry
> >>
> >> On 11/27/2013 11:18 AM, Hamdene BEN AYED wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I am using the eclipse linuxtools project V 2.0.0, especially the
> >> perf tool. I have tested their features and I want use this plugin
> >> to add some features when using Perf with the remote target. But I
> >> have a problem because the packages are not exported in this
> >> plugin.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Are there any ways to add other features using the
> >> org.eclipse.linuxtools.perf plugin?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hamdene
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> >> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > linuxtools-dev mailing list
> > linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>