Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposed removal of oprofile-devel static libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposed removal of oprofile-devel static libraries

From: Roland Grunberg <rgrunber@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:35:08 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-to: linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/linuxtools-dev>
List-help: <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

>Would it be possible to adapt the oprofile plugin to use the oprofile xml output and avoid using the static libraries?

It could be possible to use the opreport xml output (probably combined
with something like addr2line to recover the file:line info). 

For more context on the situtation there's this bug :
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273337

-- 
Roland Grunberg

Prev by Date: [linuxtools-dev] Proposed removal of oprofile-devel static libraries
Next by Date: [linuxtools-dev] Re: [dsdp-tcf-dev] TCF C agent build system
Previous by thread: [linuxtools-dev] Proposed removal of oprofile-devel static libraries
Next by thread: [linuxtools-dev] [lttng] no display after importing traces in lttng project
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs