[linuxtools-dev] Proposed removal of oprofile-devel static libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[linuxtools-dev] Proposed removal of oprofile-devel static libraries

From: William Cohen <wcohen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:24:01 -0400
Delivered-to: linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/linuxtools-dev>
List-help: <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Red Hat/3.1.1-1.el6 Thunderbird/3.1.1

Hi all,

I would like to eliminate the oprofile-devel rpm at some point from Fedora. This is mainly to eliminate some static library that Fedora discourages. The only thing that I know of that uses the static libraries is the eclipse OProfile plugin, eclipse-oprofile. Would it be possible to adapt the oprofile plugin to use the oprofile xml output and avoid using the static libraries?

-Will

Prev by Date: [linuxtools-dev] Re: [dsdp-tcf-dev] TCF C agent build system
Next by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposed removal of oprofile-devel static libraries
Previous by thread: [linuxtools-dev] Re: [dsdp-tcf-dev] TCF C agent build system
Next by thread: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposed removal of oprofile-devel static libraries
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs