Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5

From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:35:32 -0400
Delivered-to: linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/linuxtools-dev>
List-help: <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

> Please do final testing.

I've tested libhover, Valgrind, stubby, .spec editor, OProfile, and
ChangeLog.  Before publishing 0.5, I'd like to have successful testing
reports for:

- autotools
- systemtap
- callgraph
- ltt
- man

Thanks,

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5
  - From: Jeff Johnston
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5
  - From: Roland Grunberg
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5
  - From: Alexander Kurtakov

References:
- [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5
  - From: Andrew Overholt
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5
  - From: Andrew Overholt

Prev by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5
Next by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5
Previous by thread: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5
Next by thread: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs