Re: [linuxtools-dev] Plugin and feature version numbers

[Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

* Kent Sebastian <ksebasti@xxxxxxxxxx> [2009-04-09 14:12]:
> Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Kent asked about this on IRC today so I thought it would be good to
> > follow up on the mailing list.
> > 
> > The "0.2.0" part of our 0.2.0 release is simply the overall project
> > version.  It doesn't impact individual plugin or feature version
> > numbers.  Sure, some of our features or plugins may be at 0.2.0 but
> > that's not a requirement.
> > 
> 
> So it's not a requirement, but if *by coincidence* the OProfile plugins
> were to all be 0.2.0 there wouldn't be a problem right? :)

No, it won't be a problem :)

> Doing so doesn't really follow the wiki guidelines, but then it may end
> up being plugin A 0.2.0, plugin B 0.1.0, plugin C 0.1.5.. which isn't a
> bad thing by any means, but I guess I like the consistency having the
> versions coordinated.

Some other eclipse.org projects do this for consistency and I don't
think it's the end of the world by any means.

Andrew