Re: [iam-dev] Behavior of POM Editor on Validation

[Abel Muiño <amuino@xxxxxxxxx>]

I would let the user save whatever he wants (for example, you can save a java file even if it does not compile).

Regarding validation... all the checks that can be put in place will improve user experience, so I would check everything that we can quickly check.

BTW: It would be useful to have the validators as reusable components (maybe in maven.core, suggestions are welcome). For instance, groupId and artifactId are used in the new maven project wizard and are (currently) not validated.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Korina Cordero <kcordero@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I'm looking into cleaning up the validation pop-ups that I initially put for URL text fields.  I might do some more validation for a few more text fields too.

The old scenario used to show a pop up window when the URL doesn't start with the proper text( http://, https:// etc.), which I admit is not too elegant.

Abel directed me to this site that has a more cleaner method: http://toedter.com/blog/?p=36
where a little red X will be displayed beside the text field when the text field contains invalid input.  My next question is this:  Once the little red x is shown, do we allow the user to save the changes done to the POM Editor?  Or do we force the user to enter valid input and only allow the user to save once everything passes validation?

Another question I have is, aside from URL, are there any other text fields that we might need to validate?  Like email, group ID, artifact ID, etc.?

thanks,
Korina
_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev

-- 
Abel Muiño - http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/