Thomas,
Thanks for your feedback.
It seems that there is important overlap
between these 2 frameworks.
We certainly not be able to address
both. So, we need to study which is the best during the specification period
(ended sept 30th)
Thomas L Roche <tlroche@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: hyades-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
09/01/2004 07:55 PM
Please respond to
hyades-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To
hyades-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[hyades-dev] Re: junit and
derivatives
Dominique Guilbaud Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:25:28 +0200
> The plan is first to investigate the addition of the follwing
> JUnit-based tools:
> - HTTPUnit: this is for the HTTP protocol-based test and the idea
> here is to enhence the URL testing tool existing in Hyades
You might also want to consider HTMLUnit. There are partisans for each
tool; see much discussion on
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/messages
> - Cactus for J2EE component testing. Nothing exists in Hyades today
> for this kind of test, This issue I have with Cactus is the need of
> WebTool project to automate the execution. To be investigate
> - Abbot for GUI testing. Nothing exists in Hyades today for this
> kind of test, and I think that Abbot is a good candidate for this.
> More investigation need to be done
I'd be glad to help, esp as Rational Developer gets past DCUT. Note
that abbot.swt has recently added GEF support: we can, e.g., drag nodes
off the palette, connect them, etc.