[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: Re[2]: [higgins-dev] Re: Any idea when the 1.0.0 branch will be created?
|
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/21/2008 10:53:48 AM:
> Mike,
>
> I know that build files generated by higgins2ant doesn't work with
> Eclipse 3.3 (it is not too easy to make it works with it) but build
> problems we have right now have no relation with that at all.
>
> There are two main problems with builds from time to time
> appearing:
> 1. Strange classpath variables (like
> org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.internal.web.container) in some of the projects
> 2. Strange manifets folder/file in source folder of some projects
>
> At this time the problem was with all org.eclipse.higgins.util.*
> projects.
>
> For now I've fixed both of the problems and now we shouldn't have
> problems with builds.
Have you tested that? I saw plenty of build errors in this morning's
"nightly" build.
>
> Can you please make sure never commit again changes like described
> above?
>
>
> Valery
>
> Thursday, February 21, 2008, 5:06:47 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Peter,
>
> > There has been a problem with the builds of several projects for some
time
> > now.
> > I've been trying to resolve these but having problems.
> > One problem is caused by the fact that higgins2ant creates build.xml
that
> > appears to only work on Unix-based installs of Eclipse.
> > The test it performs to detect the presence of eclipse looks for a file
> > named startup.jar, which is not present on my copy of 3.3.1.1 on
windows.
> > Can someone please look into fixing this bug in Higgins2ant so we can
> > actually get a working build before declaring 1.0?
>
> > Regards,
> > Mike
>
> > higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/21/2008 09:53:22 AM:
>
> >> Higgins 1.0.0 release build completed and will be available from
> >> download server soon. Build lable "B1-0-0".
> >>
> >> Paul Trevithick wrote:
> >> >
> >> > http://wiki.eclipse.
> >> org/Higgins_Committers_and_Contributors#Repository_Branch_Structure
> >> > talks about the branch name B1-0-0. But I don’t quite know what is
> >> > being named here with the v1.0.0 or 1.0.0?
> >> >
> >> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > *From:* Brian Walker
> >> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:40 PM
> >> > *To:* Paul Trevithick; Peter Kimlach
> >> > *Cc:* Maxim Kopeyka
> >> > *Subject:* RE: Any idea when the 1.0.0 branch will be created?
> >> >
> >> > Hi Paul – Peter has been working on that today since we cleared up
the
> >> > access issues – hopefully will finish up tomorrow our time.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > one question is how you want to label this exactly – “1.0.0” or
> >> > “v1.0.0” - he can then kickoff build immediately.
> >> >
> >> > Regards…Brian
> >> >
> >> > *From:* Paul Trevithick
> >> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:37 PM
> >> > *To:* Peter Kimlach
> >> > *Cc:* Brian Walker; Maxim Kopeyka
> >> > *Subject:* Any idea when the 1.0.0 branch will be created?
> >> >
> >> > Hi Peter,
> >> >
> >> > We have a higgins-dev call tomorrow and I would like to give a
> >> > progress report on the 1.0.0 release builds, etc.
> >> >
> >> > Also, can you ask Maxim to make sure that HBX says 1.0.0 instead of
> >> > 0.9.X.X…
> >> >
> >> > -Paul
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> higgins-dev mailing list
> >> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
