Re[4]: [higgins-dev] Re: Any idea when the 1.0.0 branch will be created?

[Valery Kokhan <vkokhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike,

Yes, I tested that but on my machine only. Right now we run new
release build - will see the results in about a hour...

Valery

Thursday, February 21, 2008, 6:34:20 PM, you wrote:

> higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/21/2008 10:53:48 AM:

>> Mike,
>>
>> I know that build files generated by higgins2ant doesn't work with
>> Eclipse 3.3 (it is not too easy to make it works with it) but build
>> problems we have right now have no relation with that at all.
>>
>> There are two main problems with builds from time to time
>> appearing:
>>  1. Strange classpath variables (like
>>  org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.internal.web.container) in some of the projects
>>  2. Strange manifets folder/file in source folder of some projects
>>
>> At this time the problem was with all org.eclipse.higgins.util.*
>> projects.
>>
>> For now I've fixed both of the problems and now we shouldn't have
>> problems with builds.

> Have you tested that? I saw plenty of build errors in this morning's
> "nightly" build.

>>
>> Can you please make sure never commit again changes like described
>> above?
>>
>>
>> Valery
>>
>> Thursday, February 21, 2008, 5:06:47 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> > Peter,
>>
>> > There has been a problem with the builds of several projects for some
> time
>> > now.
>> > I've been trying to resolve these but having problems.
>> > One problem is caused by the fact that higgins2ant creates build.xml
> that
>> > appears to only work on Unix-based installs of Eclipse.
>> > The test it performs to detect the presence of eclipse looks for a file
>> > named startup.jar, which is not present on my copy of 3.3.1.1 on
> windows.
>> > Can someone please look into fixing this bug in Higgins2ant so we can
>> > actually get a working build before declaring 1.0?
>>
>> > Regards,
>> > Mike
>>
>> > higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/21/2008 09:53:22 AM:
>>
>> >> Higgins 1.0.0 release build completed and will be available from
>> >> download server soon. Build lable "B1-0-0".
>> >>
>> >> Paul Trevithick wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://wiki.eclipse.
>> >> org/Higgins_Committers_and_Contributors#Repository_Branch_Structure
>> >> > talks about the branch name B1-0-0. But I don’t quite know what is
>> >> > being named here with the v1.0.0 or 1.0.0?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> > *From:* Brian Walker
>> >> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:40 PM
>> >> > *To:* Paul Trevithick; Peter Kimlach
>> >> > *Cc:* Maxim Kopeyka
>> >> > *Subject:* RE: Any idea when the 1.0.0 branch will be created?
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Paul – Peter has been working on that today since we cleared up
> the
>> >> > access issues – hopefully will finish up tomorrow our time.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > one question is how you want to label this exactly – “1.0.0” or
>> >> > “v1.0.0” - he can then kickoff build immediately.
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards…Brian
>> >> >
>> >> > *From:* Paul Trevithick
>> >> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:37 PM
>> >> > *To:* Peter Kimlach
>> >> > *Cc:* Brian Walker; Maxim Kopeyka
>> >> > *Subject:* Any idea when the 1.0.0 branch will be created?
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Peter,
>> >> >
>> >> > We have a higgins-dev call tomorrow and I would like to give a
>> >> > progress report on the 1.0.0 release builds, etc.
>> >> >
>> >> > Also, can you ask Maxim to make sure that HBX says 1.0.0 instead of
>> >> > 0.9.X.X…
>> >> >
>> >> > -Paul
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> higgins-dev mailing list
>> >> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> higgins-dev mailing list
>> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev