Re: Re[2]: [higgins-dev] Re: Any idea when the 1.0.0 branch will be crea

[Michael McIntosh <mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx>]

higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/21/2008 10:53:48 AM:

> Mike,
>
> I know that build files generated by higgins2ant doesn't work with
> Eclipse 3.3 (it is not too easy to make it works with it) but build
> problems we have right now have no relation with that at all.
>
> There are two main problems with builds from time to time
> appearing:
>  1. Strange classpath variables (like
>  org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.internal.web.container) in some of the projects
>  2. Strange manifets folder/file in source folder of some projects
>
> At this time the problem was with all org.eclipse.higgins.util.*
> projects.
>
> For now I've fixed both of the problems and now we shouldn't have
> problems with builds.
>
> Can you please make sure never commit again changes like described
> above?

I cannot make that promise. My understanding is that in order for a WAR
project to build in a way that it includes the JARs that it depends on, it
needs those JARs included on the project, J2EE Dependencies, and when you
add projects on that Tab the org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.internal.web.container is
included.

>
>
> Valery
>
> Thursday, February 21, 2008, 5:06:47 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Peter,
>
> > There has been a problem with the builds of several projects for some
time
> > now.
> > I've been trying to resolve these but having problems.
> > One problem is caused by the fact that higgins2ant creates build.xml
that
> > appears to only work on Unix-based installs of Eclipse.
> > The test it performs to detect the presence of eclipse looks for a file
> > named startup.jar, which is not present on my copy of 3.3.1.1 on
windows.
> > Can someone please look into fixing this bug in Higgins2ant so we can
> > actually get a working build before declaring 1.0?
>
> > Regards,
> > Mike
>
> > higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/21/2008 09:53:22 AM:
>
> >> Higgins 1.0.0 release build completed and will be available from
> >> download server soon. Build lable "B1-0-0".
> >>
> >> Paul Trevithick wrote:
> >> >
> >> > http://wiki.eclipse.
> >> org/Higgins_Committers_and_Contributors#Repository_Branch_Structure
> >> > talks about the branch name B1-0-0. But I don’t quite know what is
> >> > being named here with the v1.0.0 or 1.0.0?
> >> >
> >> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > *From:* Brian Walker
> >> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:40 PM
> >> > *To:* Paul Trevithick; Peter Kimlach
> >> > *Cc:* Maxim Kopeyka
> >> > *Subject:* RE: Any idea when the 1.0.0 branch will be created?
> >> >
> >> > Hi Paul – Peter has been working on that today since we cleared up
the
> >> > access issues – hopefully will finish up tomorrow our time.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > one question is how you want to label this exactly – “1.0.0” or
> >> > “v1.0.0” - he can then kickoff build immediately.
> >> >
> >> > Regards…Brian
> >> >
> >> > *From:* Paul Trevithick
> >> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:37 PM
> >> > *To:* Peter Kimlach
> >> > *Cc:* Brian Walker; Maxim Kopeyka
> >> > *Subject:* Any idea when the 1.0.0 branch will be created?
> >> >
> >> > Hi Peter,
> >> >
> >> > We have a higgins-dev call tomorrow and I would like to give a
> >> > progress report on the 1.0.0 release builds, etc.
> >> >
> >> > Also, can you ask Maxim to make sure that HBX says 1.0.0 instead of
> >> > 0.9.X.X…
> >> >
> >> > -Paul
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> higgins-dev mailing list
> >> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev